Which tool is best described as a structured method for visualizing the trade-offs among options across multiple criteria?

• A. Force field analysis
• B. SWOT analysis
• C. Decision matrix
• D. Impact matrix

Answer: (C)

A decision matrix combines options with multiple criteria in a structured, quantitative way to reveal trade-offs. By laying each option in rows and each criterion in columns, you rate how well each option meets every criterion and apply weights to reflect how important each criterion is. The result is a clear, side‑by‑side view showing where an option performs well and where it lags, making the overall balance or trade-offs easy to compare. This helps you move beyond gut feel to a transparent decision based on weighted scores.

Other tools focus on different aims. Force field analysis maps factors that push or resist a change rather than comparing options across several criteria. SWOT analysis lists internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats, not a side‑by‑side ranking of options. An impact matrix concentrates on the consequences or severity of events rather than systematically evaluating and scoring alternatives.