Which two creative processes are at work in Premortem Analysis?

• A. What If? analysis and Classic Quadrant Crunching
• B. Reframed Questions and Method Legitimizes Dissent.
• C. Downside risk and Emerging trend
• D. Mainline assessment and Recognizable anchor

Answer: (B)

Premortem analysis relies on two creative moves that broaden how we think about a plan and its risks. First, reframed questions. Instead of asking only how things will work, you shift to imagining a future where the plan has failed and ask what conditions would have to be true for that failure to happen. This change in perspective unlocks new lines of reasoning and helps reveal failure modes that wouldn’t surface under standard planning.

Second, the method legitimizes dissent. The process explicitly invites critique and alternative viewpoints, creating a safe space for team members to voice skeptical or contrary opinions. This structured encouragement of questioning helps surface assumptions that might otherwise be accepted uncritically, leading to more robust risk identification and mitigation ideas.

Together, these two creative processes—reframing questions and fostering dissent—make premortem analysis effective at uncovering hidden risks and strengthening plans. The other options mix concepts that aren’t the core dual processes used in premortems.